Human Cloning and Its Consequences Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Human Cloning and Its Consequences - Essay ExampleHuman copy is akinwise faulty for other reasons, angiotensin-converting enzyme of them being that mankind clones might have their bodies harvested for body parts and/or human organs. Then they would be left for dead. We must remember that every person has a soul and a spirit. People should non be grown like oranges on a tree. There has been talk about, indeed, cloning people in order to harvest their organs for ones clone. This is not only chastely reprehensible, but also ethically wrong. How one could sluice consider raising a human, only to recitation the humans body parts for some other humanis almost inconceivable. It is possible, but why would some(prenominal) forward-thinking individual want to do something like that? Not only is it a moral lapse, but it would also be a societal lapse as well. The value of human life would be trim back to what a human could provide in terms of body parts and/or organs for another hu man being. That is absolutely disgusting, not to mention wrong. Human cloning has no place in our purchase order. mayhap someday, people might have more of a vested interest in seeing their clone fix body parts or even organs which they might be able to harvest for themselves. This is not only ethically dangerous but morally backwards. Cloning has no place in our society because we do not want people who look just like us, talk just like us, and, in shortmake a mockery of the human race. Everyone is an individual, and even clones would have their own personalities, even if their bodies were to be identical to the people being cloned. It has come to the attention of a one Dr. Gregory Pence that such explore is necessary in order to foment the research field in ethical medical bioengineering. As a medical doctor, he can see many reasons for why people should indeed pressure cloning in all its forms. However, when Dr. Ruth Macklin presents her ideas as to why she feels that cloning would not be a good idea, her rationale seems to make much more logical sense as to why we shouldnt clone humans. In his book Medical Ethics, Dr. Pencea seemingly ethical biomedical doctor argues in favor of cloning, noting that it is not something of which one should be afraid.2 Of course, the idea of cloning people is not an entirely upstart one, but we must take into account the risks and the problematization of human existence. We already know that stem cell experiments be taking place, so the question remains, What next? How far will we have to fall as a society for us to realize that cloning is immoral and wrong? It may not be belatedly to convince those who are persuaded by scientific research that cloning is the way to gothe wave of the future, if one will. It will not be easy to convince those who are insistent upon the fact that there is secret code wrong with cloningwhen the ethical scruples are staring us in the face. How is it going to be possible to clone people e thically? It just doesn